I think deprecating RFC7050 will be a bad idea, there are too many implementations that really need that, while updating APIs/libraries to make sure they comply with this seems easier.
For example, we could have a DHCPv6 option, but in the cellular world DHCPv6 is not used ... and even in non-cellular, Android is not using it either. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: DNSOP <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org> en nombre de Philip Homburg <pch-dnso...@u-1.phicoh.com> Fecha: jueves, 5 de julio de 2018, 12:06 Para: <dnsop@ietf.org> Asunto: Re: [DNSOP] AD sponsoring draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa >draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa document Section 7.1: "Name resolution APIs and libraries MUST recognize 'ipv4only.arpa' as "special and MUST give it special treatment. It seems to me that it is going way to far to require all DNS software to implement support for a hack that abuses DNS for configuration management of a rather poor IPv4 transition technology. I think the more obvious approach is to formally deprecate RFC 7050 and require nodes that need to do NAT64 address synthesis use one of the other methods for obtaining the NAT64 prefix. The only part of the draft that makes sense to me is to make ipv4only.arpa an insecure delegation. Any other problems are better solved by deprecating RFC 7050. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop