There were initial concerns that the IPR was unclear, and never fully settled. All the guidance I received was that the issue would be addressed
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2909/ Yes, it is old, but it was the only reference I could dig up. Tim On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 3:17 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+i...@elandsys.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > At 05:32 PM 06-07-2018, Tim Wicinski wrote: > >> One thing which arose early in the process was the issue of IPR and how >> it would be resolved. The simple answer is that it is resolved farther >> up the process chain. I spent time reading RFC 3979 on this topic: >> > > That RFC is obsolete. What is the IPR issue? > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
