On 6/27/2018 3:01 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Due to its nature, the document is a bit difficult to read, but I don't have any suggestion about how to make it better.
Could you at least provide some description of what it is that you find difficult?
The only problem I have with the document is that there are lots of informational references that are not referred to in the body of the text; they are not even listed in the Updates list at the top of the document. This should either be explained clearly in the body of the document or removed.
Assuming my xml processor produces the same list of not-used references as yours: most indeed needed to be added to the Updates list and have been. A few were carry-overs from the base document and indeed are unused here; they've been drops. Thanks for the audit.
FWIW, I'd considered replicating the Updates list in the body of the document, solely to get rid of the 'unused' list during processing, but decided that merely invites divergent copies...
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
