Tony Finch wrote:
Paul Wouters<p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
I understand, I just disagree this is the right way. I don't see why
this entire problem shouldn't be resolved at the well, resolver level.
I don't see how that can be deployed in a way that is compatible with
existing software.
there are now a half dozen x.x.x.x (where x is the same in all four
octets) public anycast resolvers. if they can all be upgraded to handle
dnssec or ECS, they can all be upgraded to handle something like ANAME.
the "resolver" here is the recursive, not the stub. stubs believe what
they hear, for good or ill. if we need to change what they hear, it's
not as impossible as changing what they understand.
--
P Vixie
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
