Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote:
> 神明達哉 wrote:
> >
> > I've always thought there's no point in standardizing ANAME-kind of
> > thing unless its ultimate goal includes the resolver-side support.
> > ...
>
> and to be clear, we already created a system like that: SRV. so if
> that's the only way we can do it, it's already done, and we know how it
> ends.
ANAME avoids some of the pitfalls that SRV encountered:
* apps and stubs don't have to be upgraded to support ANAME
* recursive support is an optimization, not a requirement
* no added last-mile latency
And there are existing implementations that demonstrate demand.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/
strengthen the democratic process and ensure that
there is a just and representative system of government
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
