Bert,

bert hubert:
[tl;dr, check out https://powerdns.org/dns-camel/ ]

Cool!

> If you know of RFCs that should or should not be on the list, please edit
> dns-rfcs.js on https://github.com/ahupowerdns/dns-camel/

I think that's fine, but probably some discussion is necessary before a
PR? (I'm happy to send one if there seems to be general agreement.)

First, we have various IDNA work:

RFC 3492 defines Punycode
RFC 5890 is IDNA
RFC 5891 is IDNA

Certainly most DNS software does not know or care about label names, but
I guess IDNA can be included in one of the "dns-use" category that you
described?

Next, RFC 3646 describes an option for DHCPv6 which configures DNS. If
you are going to include this then you need to include every way that
anyone can configure DNS, everywhere. (Or at least the IPv6 DNS router
option...) I'd say just leave it out.

Finally, mDNS is not DNS, so RFC 6762 and RFC 6763 should probably be
removed, or possibly added to a new "things that seem like DNS but
actually have nothing to do with DNS, except when they do" category?

Cheers,

--
Shane

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to