Bert, bert hubert: [tl;dr, check out https://powerdns.org/dns-camel/ ]
Cool! > If you know of RFCs that should or should not be on the list, please edit > dns-rfcs.js on https://github.com/ahupowerdns/dns-camel/ I think that's fine, but probably some discussion is necessary before a PR? (I'm happy to send one if there seems to be general agreement.) First, we have various IDNA work: RFC 3492 defines Punycode RFC 5890 is IDNA RFC 5891 is IDNA Certainly most DNS software does not know or care about label names, but I guess IDNA can be included in one of the "dns-use" category that you described? Next, RFC 3646 describes an option for DHCPv6 which configures DNS. If you are going to include this then you need to include every way that anyone can configure DNS, everywhere. (Or at least the IPv6 DNS router option...) I'd say just leave it out. Finally, mDNS is not DNS, so RFC 6762 and RFC 6763 should probably be removed, or possibly added to a new "things that seem like DNS but actually have nothing to do with DNS, except when they do" category? Cheers, -- Shane _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
