On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Evan Hunt wrote:
I think it would help if there were more clarity on what exactly is being proposed, other than adding the words "obsolete" or "deprecated" to a list of RRtypes on a website somewhere. The draft didn't seem to have particularly clear guidance to implementers.
I agree. And I don't see much point in obsoleting simple defines and logging unknown RRtypes. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
