Flattered to be mentioned. Specially thanks to Geoff and Joao for their effort to demontrate ATR with measurement and facts. You did what I desired but failed to do.
If you think ATR is worth of doing, I'm looking forward to more comments to improve it towards a formal document. -Davey On 22 March 2018 at 20:39, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > > > Here are some sketchy notes on what this might say... > > Geoff Huston just told me I need to read Davey Song's very clever > "additional truncated response" and that he would roast my suggestions > if I didn't mention ATR :-) > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-atr-large-resp > http://iepg.org/2018-03-18-ietf101/geoff.pdf > > Geoff is very keen on ATR. I think we should work on ATR, and as well as > that it would still be a good idea to work on both client-side mitigations > (for servers that don't have mitigations) and on server-side response size > reduction to avoid unnecessary ATR / TCP. > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h > punycode > Irish Sea: South or southwest 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 for a time. > Slight > or moderate, becoming rough. Occasional rain. Good occasionally poor. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
