Flattered to be mentioned. Specially thanks to Geoff and Joao for their
effort to demontrate ATR with measurement and facts. You did what I desired
but failed to do.

If you think ATR is worth of doing, I'm looking forward to more comments to
improve it towards a formal document.

-Davey
On 22 March 2018 at 20:39, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote:

> Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote:
> >
> > Here are some sketchy notes on what this might say...
>
> Geoff Huston just told me I need to read Davey Song's very clever
> "additional truncated response" and that he would roast my suggestions
> if I didn't mention ATR :-)
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-atr-large-resp
> http://iepg.org/2018-03-18-ietf101/geoff.pdf
>
> Geoff is very keen on ATR. I think we should work on ATR, and as well as
> that it would still be a good idea to work on both client-side mitigations
> (for servers that don't have mitigations) and on server-side response size
> reduction to avoid unnecessary ATR / TCP.
>
> Tony.
> --
> f.anthony.n.finch  <d...@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h
> punycode
> Irish Sea: South or southwest 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 for a time.
> Slight
> or moderate, becoming rough. Occasional rain. Good occasionally poor.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to