On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:36 PM, Davey Song <songlinj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I just submit a updated version of dns wireformat over HTTP. This draft
> has been adopted as the dnsop wg document for quite a while before DOH.
> The original intention of this draft is to explore the possiblity of DNS
> over HTTP(s) use cases and demonstrate its capacity as an experimental
> draft. But the draft lacked enough specification on HTTP requirement and
> context at that time. Since DOH later was setup focusing on developing
> https as DNS transport protocol. So I updated this draft as a a special use
> case of DOH which served as DNS proxy.
>
> I would like to ask comments and advice in dnsop and doh wgs mainly two
> quesions:
> 1) (for dns people) Does this proxy use case sounds useful as a IETF
> experiment document .
> 2) (for HTTP people) Is a media type "application/dns-tcpwireformat"
> acceptable specially for this use case. We also consider to introduce an
> optional parameter to existing  "application/dns-udpwireformat" MIME in
> DOH document, because the two media type carries the identical message body 
> (the
> udp dns wireformat)  in DOH request  in proxy use case. We need
> suggestion here.
>
> Thank to Tim and Paul Hoffman to bring this draft alive.
>
> Davey
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
> Date: 22 March 2018 at 08:59
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-
> wireformat-http-02.txt
> To: Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org>, Paul Vixie <vi...@tisf.net>,
> Linjian Song <songlinj...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Linjian Song and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http
> Revision:       02
> Title:          An Proxy Use Case of DNS over HTTPS
> Document date:  2018-03-21
> Group:          dnsop
> Pages:          6
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-
> drafts/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http-02.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/
> doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/d
> raft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http-02
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/
> doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?
> url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http-02
>
> Abstract:
>    This memo introduces a DNS proxy use case to tunnel DNS query and
>    response over HTTPs using DOH, a newly proposed DNS transport.  This
>    is useful in some situation where DNS is not working properly and DOH
>    is not widely available for many stub-resolvers.
>


The first time "DOH" is used, it should be defined.  Either:
DOH (DNS over HTTP)
or:
DNS over HTTP (DOH)

I think the second is the preferred method.

-- 
Bob Harold
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to