Hello dnsop, draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet-00 is a new draft which partially reacts to The Camel talk from yesterday, and is based on plan of open-source DNS software vendors to get rid of EDNS workarounds.
This is an attempt to simplify implementations described here: http://en.blog.nic.cz/2018/03/14/together-for-better-stability-speed-and-further-extensibility-of-the-dns-ecosystem/ We are proposing this draft for Best Current Practice status. We are happy to discuss this on list and in dnsop session if we can squeeze it in. Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet-00.txt Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:35:22 -0700 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: Petr Spacek <petr.spa...@nic.cz>, Ondrej Sury <ond...@isc.org>, Olafur Gudmundsson <olafur+i...@cloudflare.com> A new version of I-D, draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Petr Spacek and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet Revision: 00 Title: Minimal EDNS compliance requirements Document date: 2018-03-19 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 3 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-spacek-edns-camel-diet Abstract: DNS responders must either follow RFC 6891 by implementing EDNS or respond with RCODE=FORMERR to queries containing OPT record. Non- compliant implementations are not worth talking to. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
