> On Mar 19, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Darcy Kevin (FCA) <kevin.da...@fcagroup.com> > wrote: > > The trouble with "split horizon" is that it is a term of inter-network > routing of much older and more-established provenance, and thus to use it for > DNS can be viewed as a usurpation, and ultimately, confusing. (I know Cricket > had the same observation, circa 2000).
+1 to "split DNS", which has always been the term I've used and heard. I completely agree that "split horizon" muddies the water by referring to a routing concept that probably pre-dates widespread use of split DNS. Matt _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
