All

At the end of Tuesday's session we're having Bert Hubert from Power DNS
give a talk on what he views "The Camel".   He sent us a short abstract:


"In past years, DNS has been enhanced with DNSSEC, QName Minimization, EDNS
Client Subnet and in-band key provisioning through magic record types.  It
is now also seeing work on 'DNS Stateful Operations', XPF, ANAME (ALIAS),
resolver/client encryption, resolver/authoritative encryption & KSK
signalling/rollovers.
Each of these features interacts with all the others. Every addition
therefore causes a further combinatorial explosion in complexity.
Up to now, the increase in DNS complexity (mostly driven by DNSSEC) has been
made possible by the huge pool of programming talent, mostly in the open
source world.
This presentation sets out, with examples, how innoccuous features
contribute
to the combinatorial rise of complexity, and how we might ponder thinking
twice before loading up this camel further."



https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-dnsop-sessa-the-dns-camel-00

Now, before everyone jumps into the deep end here, we suggest one read RFC
8324, published February of this year https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8324 by
John Klensin.   John discusses very similar subject matter. Bert's talk has
a more "operational" focus, which is what caught this chair's eye (since
many in the WG worry about operational issues).  I believe the authors
would agree they are complementary in nature.

(If I am incorrect, the authors are free to castigate me)

thanks
Tim
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to