On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Joe Abley <jab...@90.212.199.in-addr.arpa> wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2018, at 11:58, Roland Bracewell Shoemaker < > rol...@letsencrypt.org> wrote: > > > After a number of discussions I’m interested in returning to the > original concept as it simplifies a number of use cases that this document > is intended to support but am still not sure whether or not this would be > widely considered ‘ok’ by DNS folks. Obviously it’s entirely possible to do > this as these child zones are delegated to users and they _can_ put > whatever they want in them. Does this WG have strong opinions on whether we > should/shouldn’t do this for technical reasons or we just being a bit too > strict in our reading of 3172? > > I think that if Tony can be d...@dotat.at, surely I can be > jab...@90.212.199.in-addr.arpa. > > A zone is a zone. ARPA is only special by convention, not by protocol. > > ^^ Joe spoke the truth Olafur
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
