Hi all, Per subject, see below, etc. I apologise for the ludicrous amount of time it has taken for me to do these final edits. Fortunately the beatings continued until the morale improved.
I believe the -05 represents a reasonable facsimile of the consensus of suggestions that came up at the working group last call, which some of you may recall (others are no doubt too young). Apart from language changes, the principal change from the -04 is a softening of the language regarding RRSIG, basically punting any such specification to future work whilst observing the potential for alignment in approach. This seemed like a reasonable compromise and arguably better than specifying behaviour without the benefit of real-world experience or detailed RRSIG-specific thinking. Joe > Begin forwarded message: > > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05.txt > Date: 5 March 2018 at 14:17:50 EST > To: "Joe Abley" <jab...@afilias.info>, "Marek Majkowski" > <ma...@cloudflare.com>, "Olafur Gudmundsson" <olafur+i...@cloudflare.com> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05.txt > has been successfully submitted by Joe Abley and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any > Revision: 05 > Title: Providing Minimal-Sized Responses to DNS Queries that > have QTYPE=ANY > Document date: 2018-03-05 > Group: dnsop > Pages: 10 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05 > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05 > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05 > > Abstract: > The Domain Name System (DNS) specifies a query type (QTYPE) "ANY". > The operator of an authoritative DNS server might choose not to > respond to such queries for reasons of local policy, motivated by > security, performance or other reasons. > > The DNS specification does not include specific guidance for the > behaviour of DNS servers or clients in this situation. This document > aims to provide such guidance. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
