On 02/21/2018 02:53 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Hmmm... Good point. I personally actually preferred having these as > "decimal" keys. > RFC1034, Sec 5.3: The DS RR Presentation Format sayeth: > " The Key Tag field MUST be represented as an unsigned decimal > integer.", things like dig +multiline DNSKEY . shows it as decimal, > etc.
Yes, using the (unpadded) presentation format would certainly feel more natural to me (rfc4034), as that seems the generally preferred format. I may have missed some arguments in favor of the current style. --Vladimir @ cz.nic _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
