Marek Vavruša wrote:
That's a good point. Personally, I'd favour a referral response since it saves resolver a round trip (at least for resolvers not doing QNAME minimisation), it seems in conflict with 3.1.4.1 though as you pointed here.
...
I think an erratum to 4035 is in order, clarifying the language such that servers would return the referral in this case. I have not figured out the exact wording yet (but I will). What does dnsop think?
i think as you and marek do. -- P Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
