On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:31:11AM -0800, > Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote > a message of 17 lines which said: > >> > Probably relevant for this group. >> >> Surprisingly not. An IETF-conflict review is just the IESG's way of >> giving input on a document that the Independent Submissions Editor >> (ISE) might publish in the future. > > When I said "relevant", I was not speaking of the IETF-conflict review > but of the document itself, which will probably be of interest for > people here. >
<no hats> Yup -- I personally thought that this was a good read, and contained a bunch of useful background. For those readers who think if feels strangely familiar (from early June 2017): https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=dnsop&q=What+can+be+done+with+the+DNS+and+what+should+be+done+elsewhere+%5Bdraft-klensin-dns-function-considerations%5D W > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
