Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
As I mentioned in this errata <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4983>, I think RFC 2308 was wrong in redefining QNAME. My personal preference would be to change the second paragraph to "RFC 2308 proposed another definition, different from the original one. Since it is actually a different concept, it would be better to find another name for it. Here, QNAME retains the original definition of RFC 1034."
+1. -- P Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
