During the discussions about draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root or about draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal, there have been many remarks about the risk for privacy if we delegate things to AS 112: unlike the root (or .arpa), AS 112 is managed by many different people we don't know and cannot know. So, leaked requests are more at risk of surveillance with AS 112.
But I notice that draft-ietf-homenet-dot, currently in the RFC Editor queue, delegates home.arpa to AS 112, in its section 7 (unless I'm wrong, it will be the first delegation to the new AS 112, the one with DNAME, described in RFC 7535). Does it mean the privacy problem is solved? Or simply overlooked? Can we delegate RFC 6761 special-use domains such as .internal to AS 112? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
