On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 07:08:01PM -0800, Paul Vixie wrote: > that's fatally unclear.
So I gather :) > then the thing to say would be "a referral should always be downward, and if > a non-downward referral is received, it should be treated as a network data > configuration error". No, that is attempting to define away other kinds of referrals, which is precisely the discussion we were previously having (and why Joe and I wrote that other draft). The terminology draft should not, in my opinion, attempt to change any RFC; and, IMO, 1034 defines referrals in such a way that someone _could_ think that upward referrals are sometimes a normal part of operation. If we want to change the advice of what to do there, I think a different document is needed. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
