Joe Abley wrote:
On Nov 23, 2017, at 06:19, Havard Eidnes<h...@uninett.no> wrote: ... While a single slave sending zone transfer requests to a single master is still a valid example of such a graph, I think it's more a degenerate case than the usual case today. In that sense the idea of using a single master (which I think is implied by "primary master" and a name published in a single MNAME field) is defensibly archaic.
you need to get out more. by zone count, the IETF methodolody dominates the field. microsoft's AD approach, and other multi-master approaches, are used by the big guys, but they do not handle most zones.
My perspective may not be universal, of course, but that's what I see.
this mailing list demonstrates the same myopia on many topics, as if a lack of evidence is itself evidence of nonexistence. that's just not so.
-- P Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
