Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Jacques Latour wrote: > > > Personally, I like a mix of #3 and #1, on a regular basis poll the entire > > zone for changes, and have a mechanism to listen to child notifications > > for urgent changes. > > Agreed.
Yes. > > _AND_ remember, the preferred method by far is to submit a DS/DNSKEY > > record is via the RRR EPP model. The above is when that RRR EPP model is > > non functional. > > That preference might be political not technical. I personally like the > DNS based solutions over the EPP based one, because it requires no > humans or webgui's :) EPP isn't available to most registrants or operators, since it's a registrar <-> registry protocol -- remember the motivation for CDS/CSYNC was lack of any operator <-> registrar update protocol, and lack of any way to provide registrar credentials to DNS operators. There are plenty of parent zones which don't have an EPP back end - examples I care about include the reverse DNS, ac.uk, cam.ac.uk, etc. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode South Utsire, Southeast Forties: Northwesterly backing southerly 5 or 6, increasing 7 or gale 8 later. Moderate or rough. Showers, rain later. Good, occasionally poor later. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
