Geoff Huston <g...@apnic.net> writes: >> I think the number 4 on the slide was different from the one in the mail. > > > I thought so too, but I wasn’t sure if it was me not paying attention > in the WG meeting or not!
Yes, you're both right. And absolutely my bad for writing the presentation without looking at the mail I sent and synchronizing the numbering. The preferred option in the room was the 16-bit value that would be used in combination with the rcode to indicate the full meaning of the extension value. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
