Hi, On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 06:04:06PM -0800, Paul Vixie wrote: > > they must be ignored, because they could constitute part of a referral loop. > valid referrals are to descendants not ancestors or cousins.
[…] > we should note that an upward or sideways or other non-downward referral is > a sign of misconfiguration and must be treated as SERVFAIL. I am a little uncomfortable with using this document to specify protocol behaviour as opposed to specifying protocol behaviour already specified elsewhere. I may have missed them, but I am not sure either of these requirements (musts) are stated so baldly in any RFC. Have I missed something? A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
