I see that this draft uses a syntax similar to RFC 8145 Trust Anchor Telemetry RFC (which uses _ta-<hex_id>) albeit without the leading underscore, i.e. .ta-<hex_id>.
I'd like to propose instead <hex-id>._ta.<domain> This would allow _ta to be registered as a standalone entry in the underscore label registry, whilst also avoid the risk of collisions with "plain" labels that happen to match ta-<hex> FWIW, I think in retrospect that RFC 8145 should have taken a similar approach too. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
