there is some evidence to suggest that two factors will drive increasingly
large responses.  first is signing with multiple algorithms and second is
increases in key sizes.  in a worst case model, we have to shift to
the McEliece
cryptosystem, post quantum crypto. for a standard selection of parameters,
the public key is 512 kilobits long.  for quantum computing, key sizes must
be increased by a factor of four due to improvements in information set
decoding.  Attacking and defending the *McEliece cryptosystem*
<https://www.google.com/url?url=http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url%3Furl%3Dftp://nozdr.ru/biblio/kolxo3/Cs/CsLn/Post-Quantum%252520Cryptography,%2525202%252520conf.,%252520PQCrypto%2525202008(LNCS5299,%252520Springer,%2525202008)(ISBN%2525209783540884026)(239s).pdf%2523page%253D40%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26scisig%3DAAGBfm0XEERxI9tL9IfgPGaNOklLIG0r1Q%26nossl%3D1%26oi%3Dscholarr&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiD6ue0pbvWAhVY-GMKHeFKBUIQgAMIJygAMAA&usg=AFQjCNHV1StJs0Pom6FVNA77UEgVzinRbw>
 - ‎Bernstein   ....   so, yes, bigger responses should be planned for.
Anyone for DNS over BitTorrent?  :)

/Wm

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Davey Song(宋林健) <ljs...@biigroup.cn> wrote:

> Thank you.
>
>
>
> The large DNS response in IPv6 is a real problem. ATR is one option to 
> adopted in authoritative  server alone. If someone or party have more 
> influence on both resolver and authoritative side (cloud and app provider who 
> can choose their own DNS resolution path),  Mukund’s proposal to fragment the 
> DNS message is a good solution.   
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-muks-dns-message-fragments-00
>
>
>
> So I do recommend ATR and DNS message fragments should be both considered
>  in a tool box for large DNS response issues.
>
>
>
> Davey
>
>
>
> *发件人:* DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] *代表 *william manning
> *发送时间:* 2017年9月21日 1:30
> *收件人:* Davey Song
> *抄送:* dnsop
> *主题:* Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-song-atr-large-resp-00.txt
>
>
>
> i think this is a worthy document for consideration.
>
>
>
> /Wm
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Davey Song <songlinj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> I just submit a draft dealing with issue of large DNS response especially
> in IPv6. Commnets are welcome.
>
>
>
> If chairs think it is in the scope of dnsop wg and encourage us to discuss
> it in this mailing list, I can submit it as a draft listed in dnsop wg.
>
>
>
> Davey
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
> Date: 11 September 2017 at 10:13
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-song-atr-large-resp-00.txt
> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
>
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
>
>         Title           : ATR: Additional Truncated Response for Large DNS
> Response
>         Author          : Linjian Song
>         Filename        : draft-song-atr-large-resp-00.txt
>         Pages           : 8
>         Date            : 2017-09-10
>
> Abstract:
>    As the increasing use of DNSSEC and IPv6, there are more public
>    evidence and concerns on IPv6 fragmentation issues due to larger DNS
>    payloads over IPv6.  This memo introduces an simple improvement on
>    authoritative server by replying additional truncated response just
>    after the normal large response.
>
>    REMOVE BEFORE PUBLICATION: The source of the document with test
>    script is currently placed at GitHub [ATR-Github].  Comments and pull
>    request are welcome.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-atr-large-resp/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-atr-large-resp-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-song-atr-large-resp-00
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to