On 9 September 2017 at 00:32, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > > > > if they really need this, they should provide a method by which i can > specify > > both a TTL and an Expiry, and i will consider publishing both values, > and if i > > do, then they can use them the way i intend them. > > RRSIG sort-of does that? > > Perhaps there's value in looking at HTTP's Cache-Control frankenbeast, particularly RFC 5861. Being able to specify stale-on-error / stale-while-revalidate (or explicitly *not*) alongside a hard TTL could be useful.
Cheers -- Matthew Kerwin http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
