On 09/08/2017 11:15 AM, Davey Song(宋林健) wrote: > I just notice it asks for "Standards Track" document. If it aims to > introduce a special use of resolver to achieve some features for their > users' benefit, I think informational document may be more appropriate ? I > guess, like what RFC7706 does.
It was argued that the draft modifies the meaning of TTL and therefore "updates" 1034+1035 which are on Standards Track. I agree with that point of view. --Vladimir _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
