On 5 September 2017 at 00:01, Walter H. <walte...@mathemainzel.info> wrote:
> > > The keyword above was examples which they clearly were. Most of > > 1.0.0.0/8 is in use today despite those examples. The use of local > > test were also clearly examples. The Microsoft page above advocated > > the use literal use of .local which is very different. > > and now in the IPv6 ages the same bug is done again ... > > 2001:db8: ... > > 2001:db8::/32 is reserved for documentation in RFC 3849. As 192.0.2.0/24, 198.51.100.0/24, and 203.0.113.0/24 were in RFC 5737. It's not a bug, it's a feature.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
