El 17 ag 2017, a les 18:22, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> va 
escriure:
> Sorry if this isn't as clear as I intended - basically, what I'm saying, is 
> that the answer might not even be an IP, protocol and port, but might even be 
> a "file:/// <file:///>" URI, for a named pipe, which avoids the whole IP 
> stack.

It's hard to see how this is going to help.   What we are trying to do here is 
bypass DNS; now you are asking us to go through DNS to get the name of a local 
resource and contact it.   So really you've just increased the attack surface.


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to