On 11 Aug 2017, at 7:39, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > It sounds like you're assuming that SWILD would be supported by caching > servers that do not support DNSSEC or NSEC aggressive use. Why do you > expect implementers would adopt SWILD before adopting these much older > features?
This is my top question on the document. --Paul HOffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
