For TCP connections, being able to signal session liveness policy is useful for DNS, not just DNSSD. It seems likely that DNS Push is useful for things other than DNSSD. I think this is generally useful, not just for DNSSD. Rather than thinking of this as a DNSSD-specific enhancement, think of this as an enhancement to section 4.2.2 of RFC1035.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.s...@nic.cz> wrote: > Hey, > > there's one thing I don't really understand from this draft. > > Is this useful for DNS at all, or is this targeted at DNS-SD only? > > I think this needs some explaining and perhaps a clear cut is needed. > Although it's not mentioned anywhere in the document, the draft makes > much more sense to me, if it would clearly state, this should be only > used in DNS-SD sessions. >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
