On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 04:42:21AM -0700, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> wrote a message of 11 lines which said:
> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes in state > Candidate for WG Adoption Did anyone was brave enough to make a detailed comparison between this draft and other proposals like draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions? (I was thinking myself of writing a draft on a ultra-simple proposal, allowing QDCOUNT to be > 1 but forcing all QNAMEs to be identical, but I never got time.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
