Hi, Benoit, On Jul 5, 2017 12:32 PM, "Benoit Claise" <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote:
Hi, Hi, Ted, On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote: > Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just to point > this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be correct. It is > claimed to be the list of problems that people have asserted exist. I do > not agree that all the problems listed are problems, nor I think does > anyone else. If that's not clear in the document, that's probably worth > correcting. > I think my comments are more likely to be unclear than the way the document describes the problem set. What you said, is what I think the document says. I'm mostly sending comments about specific points that the document makes, that I think I understand at a surface level, but I don't think I understand the implications in a few cases, so, that's what I included in my ballot. I think the document is clear enough on "claimed to be the list of problems that people have asserted exist", and even if I didn't think that was a fine basis for this document, I wouldn't dream of suggesting that the authors change the criteria for what's included. Part of my AD review, I asked the text to clarified. Hopefully, it's clarified. >From the 04 to 05 diff: That is clear (and clearer than -04). Spencer Regards, B. On Jul 5, 2017 12:32 PM, "Benoit Claise" <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: Hi, Hi, Ted, On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote: > Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just to point > this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be correct. It is > claimed to be the list of problems that people have asserted exist. I do > not agree that all the problems listed are problems, nor I think does > anyone else. If that's not clear in the document, that's probably worth > correcting. > I think my comments are more likely to be unclear than the way the document describes the problem set. What you said, is what I think the document says. I'm mostly sending comments about specific points that the document makes, that I think I understand at a surface level, but I don't think I understand the implications in a few cases, so, that's what I included in my ballot. I think the document is clear enough on "claimed to be the list of problems that people have asserted exist", and even if I didn't think that was a fine basis for this document, I wouldn't dream of suggesting that the authors change the criteria for what's included. Part of my AD review, I asked the text to clarified. Hopefully, it's clarified. >From the 04 to 05 diff: Regards, B.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
