>> how depressing. one obvious curiousity is who asked the one-sided >> question? otoh, maybe i don't want to know. but i wish you had >> perceived a wider responsibility to the community. > > It was discussed at length in the working group, so I would say that > you could In principle have raised this concern sooner. However, I > will admit that it didn’t occur to me to do so either. In any case, it > really is a separate issue from that covered by this draft, and so > there’s no reason why we can’t do this work if you think it’s worth > doing. Given the situation with ICANN and GTLD, it may be moot, but I > wouldn’t mind writing it down.
we really should not cover our eyes when we send in the assassins. i would offer to put my keyboard where my mouth is. but i fear that, at the bottom, i would have the unreasonable desire for dns classes to support these kinds of things. i.e. i don't think we have a clean fix. but it would be nice to document the good with the bad. randy _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
