On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:17 PM, The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> wrote:
> > The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG > (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Special-Use Domain Names > Problem Statement' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-06-20. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > The Special-Use Domain Names IANA registry policy defined in RFC 6761 > has been shown through experience to present unanticipated > challenges. This memo presents a list, intended to be comprehensive, > of the problems that have been identified. In addition it reviews > the history of Domain Names and summarizes current IETF publications > and some publications from other organizations relating to Special- > Use Domain Names. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. Minor nit: 4.1.2. Special-Use Domain Names Last part of the last sentence:"they can only use the mDNS protocol be used for resolving that Domain Name." Looks like "be used" is redundant and should be removed. -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
