On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 07:20:55PM -0400, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote a message of 92 lines which said:
> This message opens a Working Group Last Call for: > > "The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain" > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/> I've read -08 and I believe I understand this draft. I'm not convinced it's useful (most users of alternative resolution systems won't use it and, anyway, I'm not even sure it will be added in the Special-Use registry, which was wrongly frozen by the IESG) but I don't see big issues with the draft, it seems to me it correctly describes the new TLD. Editorial : Section 1: "and that should not be resolved" I cannot parse it. Missing "it"? Section 5 : After "and anyone watching queries along the path", add a reference to RFC 7626? Normative references: Why is RFC 6303 a normative reference? It is no longer used. Why is RFC 7686 a normative reference? It is just an example. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
