So, now that this draft is re-activated, I'm perusing old postings ...
On 12/11/2015 12:46 PM, Bob Harold wrote:
_adsp. has trailing dot, none of the others do.
The current model is to ignore 'subordinate' underscore names, such as _adsp and treat them as out of scope.
pgpkeys missing leading _
ack. good catch.
_im listed twice, but with different rfc's - should at least put the entries next to each other
So it turns out the entry was multiply wrong. Basically, _im and _pres are _Service names, subdordinate to the _Proto name and the later is all that this spec now needs to cover.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
