Hi, On Mar 26, 2017, 5:37 PM -0700, George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org>, wrote:
> In no sense is the domain solely used or intended for PTR requests, Is anyone claiming this? If so, that'd be really silly given the contents of the .ARPA zone is: as112.arpa. e164.arpa. in-addr-servers.arpa. in-addr.arpa. ip6-servers.arpa. ip6.arpa. ipv4only.arpa. iris.arpa. uri.arpa. urn.arpa. Of those, only two are used for PTR requests. > I particularly like that we don't actually have to do very much beyond > note it, and ask IANA to operate a registry for it. I'll admit I'm a bit confused: what would be in such a registry? Truth be told, I sort of like the "home.arpa" idea -- seems to dodge a lot of layer 9 stuff (unless, of course, the whole point is to try to resolve layer 9 issues). Regards, -drc
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
