On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 3/10/17 5:07 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
Once a document becomes a WG document the authors are required to
incorporate WG consensus.
If this does not / is not happening, the chairs have the option /
responsibility to replace the authors with ones that do...
If there's no consensus for advancing an altered or unaltered document
then that's a problem; but not one that hasn't happened before. Consent
is pert of concensus.
The problem is on how to answer the call for adoption.
I am in favour of adopting it if we can update it with some of the
changes I've suggested earlier on. I do not want to adopt it unmodified
as informational RFC for running existing code.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
