Hi, This is a good point, thanks Paul.
If you’re an editor on a WG document, please consider what you need from the WG to get it ready for a Working Group Last Call. If you’re missing reviews/reviewers, the chairs/secretary are happy to help you find some. If you need input from the WG, please ask for it. If you’ve been meaning to review a Working Group document, why not make it part of your prep for IETF 98? And if you want to propose new work, please remember you’ll need reviewers and editors, and pay it forward by reviewing a current draft or two :-) Suzanne > On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:51 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > > <secretary-hat on> > > As you are thinking of agenda requests, please look at > https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/dnsop/doclist.html > There are a lot of WG documents for which we haven't heard much discussion > *on the list*. Instead, we seem to hear more about documents that are > "Candidate for WG adoption" or document that people want in that category. > > It would be grand if we could have more discussion about any of the WG > documents on the list before having presentations in the face-to-face > meeting: that makes the meeting time more useful. > > --Paul Hoffman > > <secretary-hat off> > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
