Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> writes: > Fortunately, after a quick conversation we've recovered the reason. > Publishing a new version with a break-out explanation shortly. The 3/2 > is absolutely is needed.
I've published -03 which adds new text just below the equation explaining the components (and the equation got more complex to match the complexity of 5011). Anyway, please do let me know if you think the new text adequately explains the problem to you. I probably need to go back and insert the "worst case" timing into the example timeline, but that would make the example a bit more messy. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
