> On Feb 13, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Richard Gibson <rgib...@dyn.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Robert Edmonds <edmo...@mycre.ws> wrote: > You think this would actually provide any sort of useful information? No > operator would understand what "MBZ: 0xNNNN" means without re-training, > and if you're re-training operators you may as well point them to this > document. > > I think it would be _very_ useful. People easily forget new information, but > seeing unexpected data like that would provide the necessary trigger for > remembering this document and e.g. retrying with +tcp.
I dislike the idea of a EDNS "partial response" flag. Tools like dig, when asked to issue an ANY query over UDP can: 1) fail with "ANY over UDP is deprecated", or 2) warn with "ANY over UDP might give partial results", or 3) automatically use TCP DW _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
