On Feb 3, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Obviates the need for (most?) interpretations of "technical use". > Helps separate the regions of the Domain Namespace over which IETF and ICANN > have authority. > Allows for ad hoc assignment of special use names.
I would really strongly object to adding either of these statements. You are essentially adding policy to a draft that is not a policy draft, and I think that's a really bad idea. > Mitigates the problem that newly utilized special use names are assumed to > use DNS for resolution by most existing software. I'm not sure I buy this one either. This only works for experimental special-use names. I would be okay with this: > Mitigates the problem that experimental special use names are assumed to use > DNS for resolution by most existing software.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
