Ray Bellis wrote: > Yes, that seems like a reasonable suggestion, although it would be a > shame to have to rev the doc if another IP version should even happen to > be introduced in the future...
It can be rev'd in the same document that introduces a DNS address RR for that address family :-) -- Robert Edmonds _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
