On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:04:38AM -0500, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote a message of 54 lines which said:
> If the question is “Does the existence of an Informational RFC mean > people will think the IETF is endorsing or promoting a technology or > practice, and are they more likely to use it as a result?” the > answer is pretty subjective and tends to be “It depends”— on the > technology, on whether the document includes warnings about > shortcomings and side effects, [...] OK but, precisely, there is no such warning in the current draft. Publishing a document without warnings and saying "we did not endorse it, we just published a description" seems to me on the verge of hypocrisy. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
