SMTP configuration is not relevant... That said, the morphing of open SMTP services to the tightly controlled heirarchy and draconian locally administered rules which prevent delivery are EXACTLY what this draft proposes for the DNS.
On Sunday, 18 December 2016, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jim is correct, this is not relevant > > tim > > > On 12/18/16 7:37 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > >> >> On 18 Dec 2016, at 12:28, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: >>> >>> You're saying that most spam messages contain a Message-ID header. >>> >> >> Please take this discussion somewhere else. It is not appropriate for >> dnsop. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >> > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
