On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:13:27PM -0500, > tjw ietf <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote > a message of 94 lines which said: > > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for: > > "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3" > > draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse > > I've read -07 and I believe it is OK and ready for publication. All my > (many) remarks have been addressed, I think. > > Two details: > > > [RFC8020], and [I-D.vixie-dnsext-resimprove] proposes first steps to > > using NXDOMAIN information for more effective caching > > IMHO, RFC 8020 supersedes draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove, so it is not > necessary to mention both. If you prefer to do so for historical > completeness, may be you should mention them in the chronological > order? > > > As these benefits are only accrued by those using DNSSEC, it is > > hoped that these techniques will lead to more DNSSEC deployment. > > This sentence should really be deleted. It seems to imply that DNSSEC > cannot work on its own merits and need extra arguments. "NSEC > aggressive use of caching"'s goal is not to promote DNSSEC, it is to > improve the DNS! > I would like to respectfully disagree. I read the sentence as saying that this adds one more benefit to running DNSSEC, which makes people like me want to move DNSSEC closer to the top of my priority list. -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
