In message <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=qhhsnvi1d3gn4knxhsga...@mail.gmail.com> , Ted Lemon writes: > > A stub resolver is expected to query a caching resolver, not the root. So > all that is required for this to work is that the resolver advertised on > the homenet claim authority for the zone, and that there be an unsecured > delegation that validates that the homenet resolver can give to the stub > resolver. Stub resolvers that query the root themselves will fail. This > is a feature--that behavior is broken.
Why shouldn't a iterative resolver work if we can make it work? Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
