On 14/12/2016 21:33, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > Ray Bellis writes: > > > On 14/12/2016 20:14, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > > > Any reason why homenet shuld use a TLD? What is wrong with something > > > like homenet.arpa (or thuisnet.arpa, or bob.arpa). > > > > <hat partly-on> > > Which hat?
Sorry - Homenet WG co-chair :) > But is there a technical argument? Or is this just a well a believe > it doesn't fit perfectly. Does it really matter how the identifier > is called? No technical arguments, AFAICR, but user-friendliness and acceptance are desirable criteria. I should note that this has already been discussed ad-nauseum on the Homenet WG list and in WG sessions. The WG consensus was to apply via RFC 6761 process for ".homenet", but then the insecure delegation point was raised. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
